Q: Might ideas be constructed along lines similar to Y-Bias and OSI?

 

DY: The analogy is apt but the manifestation is divergent in this sense; at the fifth scale, where quarks combine to create hadrons, the combination of the first fully organised constituents of matter are realised. Before this scale, gravitational force does not operate anywhere, which is ample evidence that gravitational force is a product of underlying interactions rather than an apriori force in its own right. Hadrons and leptons combine to form atoms at the sixth scale. Atoms combine to form molecules at the seventh scale. Molecules combine to create the complex systems you have identified. Your description of the ninth and tenth scale interactions are also apt.

 

Q: Could we apply the concepts of Y-Bias and angularity to the way we approach the construction of ideas?

 

DY: Yes we could. Look at the possibilities – when you recognise that WHAT you are is the consummate integration of physicality coupled with mind, that ought to change everything about the way you perceive yourself and apprehend meaning to your experience in this mortal plane.

 

Second, the fact that self-organising criticality is operative in, as and around you, in all things and at all times and in all circumstances means that life is neither predictable in the timing, magnitude, locality nor frequency of the occurrences, nor is it without order or purpose. It is, in point of fact, simply a speciated component of the larger fractal, evolving and developing as individuated constituents interact with each other to produce a fullness of expression.

 

Third, this set of conditions cannot exist [if our model is correct] unless the precursors to the material evolutional cycle survive the completion of time-denominated segments of the physical evolutional experience. In other words, we have always been who we are, and in this life we are in the process of becoming what our purpose has been organised  to evolve into. We survive beyond the mortal experience to become more than we were, and in some if not all instances, we travel the path of physical mortality many times, in various roles, as varying expressions, in order to become fully realised by our own experience, by ourselves and with others.

 

The Hindus got it right – life is an eternal cycle and death but a portal to another expression of it.

 

Q: Where might the seat of consciousness be located, if anywhere?

 

DY: The science of it strongly suggests that consciousness is not held in the head or any other particular part of the physical form. In fact, if Kirlian photography is to be credited, if Poponin’s Phantum DNA effect is to be understood, if the work of Brian Weiss, Kenneth Ring, Raymond Moody and many, many others are to be understood, every single cell in the physical apparatus is organised according to the non-local field effects exerted by the master program, which is physically embodied in the DNA. Dr Bruce Lipton has unlocked the secret combination by which the cellular structure couples with Mind to define the form and functions of all biological forms on the planet.

 

The primary field, the one from which all things rise, is intrinsic to all things – not just living things but all things, bar none. Jagada Chandra Bose demonstrated one hundred years ago how true this is when he showed that at or below a certain scale, it is not possible to distinguish between organic and inorganic matter. The reason is simple – because there is a point at which self-organising criticality begins to distinguish between the forms rather than the substance of physical expressions manifest by the SOC processes.

 

Q: At death, would its impact on consciousness be akin to say, turning the car ignition key which cuts off electricity thereby stopping the engine.

 

DY: No. The functions of the physical body continue in many fundamental ways to operate long after the consciousness of Self has uncoupled from the physical form. The Tibetan Book of Death and Dying, as well as the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the Hebrew Kabala, the ancient Codex of the Olmec and Toltec Shamans make it clear that the spiritual form of Self can remain in the vicinity of the unoccupied physical body for a long, long time.

 

Ken Ring and Ray Moody have made it their purpose in life to document tens of thousands of near death experiences. And among the body of impeccably research data, which comes from all cultures, religious backgrounds and economic, racial and cultural demographics, we find that people who have decoupled temporarily from their bodies are able to see and hear and touch and feel and think and perceive and apprehend meaning in the experience. When they return to their physicality, they are fundamentally altered because they know that who and what they are is not defined by the body suit they wear during life.

 

I have been in this experience – and I can tell you it is no accident of nature. We can talk about this some time.

 

If you haven’t done so already, I would strongly encourage you to read the work of Dr Brian Weiss [ Many Lives, Many Masters ] What Janov has learnt about the Primal Healing experience is that it has nothing to with death and dying. What it has everything to do with is stripping the control mechanisms away so that the seminal wounding can be re-experienced in its fullness without the prospect of death.

 

What Weiss has discovered, for example, is that patients with chronic physical symptoms, which resist all forms of conventional allopathic treatment, can be taken back to a prior life experience in which an injury or death occurred – by re-experiencing the episode and being facilitated to reframe it by a competent profession, the physical symptoms simply go away.

 

What this suggests is truly extraordinary – the time based paradigm we operate in is so fundamentally limited by our own notions that we can scarcely get our heads around the conundrum. How is it that re-experiencing a prior event, which occurred in another life manifestation, can serve to eliminate physical symptoms in this lifetime? It’s wonderful validation of our whole concept and ought to take the fear out of the picture that death is somehow final.

 

----------------------

 

All this suggests to me that:

 

Ideas are little packets of feeling.

 

It is feeling that holds meaning - meaning to life, meaning to existence, meaning to what we see, what we hear, what we smell, what we touch, what gets us excited and raring to go.

 

It is feeling that gives meaning to death, to relationships, to our partners, our children, our friends.

 

Love is feeling.

 

Without feeling there is no meaning.

 

The idea is an esoteric, exotic, ethereal, abstract, conveyor of feeling that contains in its kernel meaning that is liberated when feeling impinges on consciousness. The idea itself I envisage is contained in a capsule that I like to think is in all likelihood built up from seven layers or levels similar to, but not identical, to the levels or scales that Y-Bias and the OSI encapsulate.

 

               I, dear <---> idea <---> eyed ear <---> reared I

 

One can surmise that the Goddess of Life retrieves Feeling from the primal pool of Nothingness, and that when it impinges on consciousness in an appropriate receptacle, gets felt thereby generating a thought which gives Meaning, and which the Goddess of Death returns to the primal pool to once again become Nothing in an ever recurring cycle.

 

Consciousness is the medium for the propagation of ideas which are little packets of feeling that can be absorbed and assimilated by sentient beings who are blessed with intelligence, and which are capable of transforming that feeling into meaning.

 

Now that’s magic.

 

                                   Evolution? No! I t'u love.